I have just read Walter Isaacson’s biography of Benjamin Franklin, Benjamin Franklin: An American Life, and was struck by Franklin’s “great rallying cry for the new American middle class,” according to the author, or, as Franklin in his pamphlet, Plain Truth, said, “We the middling class people. The tradesmen, shopkeepers, and farmers of the province and city!” I contrast this emphasis with the recent Iowa Democratic gubernatorial debate and the five candidates running in next Tuesday’s primary and separately this past Wednesday, when Governor Kim Reynolds signed Iowa’s new tax-reform law.
Category Archives: Iowa
Health Reform and Primum Non Nocere Revisited
Several months ago in this space, I discussed my concerns about a Trump presidency regarding the Latin phrase “primum non nocere,” which means “first do no harm.” Now, at the end of the 2018 Iowa Legislative session, I revisit this phrase to discuss my concerns about the results that this Republican-dominated Legislature and the Republican governor have created or are creating.
Health Reform and Why Words Should Matter
Ah, words! Especially to writers, they are more precious than jewels, as essential as air, and powerful enough to create entire worlds. We chase them, massage or mince them, we roll them around in our mouths, savoring every delicious subtlety. Mostly, we love them.
~Tammy Letherer
Ms. Letherer wrote these words on a blog entry titled Why Words Matter (In and Out of the Locker Room), on October 16, 2016. In that post, she discussed her unhappiness with Donald Trump’s language regarding women.
In Iowa, former U.S. Representative Bruce Braley lost his Senate race with Joni Ernst in large part to an audiotape of his words to political contributors in Texas disparaging our senior senator, Chuck Grassley, describing him as “a farmer from Iowa who never went to law school.”
This year’s health-care debate, centered on the Republicans’ efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA), has led to many statements by Republican leaders in Iowa that should come back to haunt them this Halloween season and for seasons to come, as Bruce Braley’s words haunted him.
Health Reform and Spudnutz
I stood in line at 6:45 Sunday morning to purchase donuts at a very popular local donut shop — Spudnutz — at Lake Okoboji. The line of donut-seekers stretched far out the door. I did not receive donuts until 7:50 a.m. I waited more than an hour for donuts. (Yes, very good donuts). Nine people were working in that donut shop that once housed an auto mechanic shop.
If either the Senate bill or the House bill that was intended to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA) became law, I fear none of those nine hardworking people would have health-care coverage in the future. For many of my patients and for, I believe, the employees of Spudnutz, I give thanks for the defeat of the Senate “skinny” repeal legislation.
Health Reform and Blood Money
In 2003, Iowa used part of its portion of the 1998 Tobacco Settlement monies to help build a new Supreme Court Building. During those years and later, Iowa Republican legislators sought to reduce the funding and scope of the Iowa Tobacco Use Prevention and Control Commission, which was created to use the settlement monies to help Iowans to either quit smoking or not start. I said at that time that using the Tobacco Settlement monies for any use other than health care was wrong. As a former chair of the Tobacco Commission, I viewed this money as blood money because it was being paid out to partially compensate for the death and disease that cigarettes had caused Iowans for many decades.
Similarly, I use the same term, blood money, today regarding the U.S. Republican House and Senate efforts to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act with a plan that will reduce wealthy individuals’ taxes by more than $600 billion over 10 years by taking a similar amount of money from the Medicaid program and from subsidies used to supplement poor and low-income individuals’ effort to pay for premiums in the individual health-insurance market.
Health Reform and the Orphan Called the Individual Health-Insurance Market
Last week, the buzz in Washington, D.C., where I heard numerous lectures and personally talked to two U.S. representatives and two U.S. senators, was about impending health-care legislation in the Senate and particularly focused on the imminent crisis in Iowa, where there probably will be no insurers for the individual insurance market in 94 of its 99 counties in 2018.
Seventy thousand Iowans may not have health insurance next year in a state that prides itself as an insurance state. Iowa is the poster child for the deficiencies in the individual insurance market. Across the nation, only a few counties in Tennessee have that known potential for 2018, though several potential fixes are being discussed at the federal and state levels.
Health Reform and Primum Non Nocere
Following the admonition to “First do no harm,” I will refrain from sharing a post I wrote before the presidential election that would not promote a productive conversation regarding the future of health reform. Instead, I will share some immediate thoughts regarding the future President Donald Trump.
Health Reform and ACO Incentives – Getting It Right
We need to get this right. As I have said last month, I continue to be dismayed by the evidence that health-care costs are not being controlled. For example, in Minnesota, one of nation’s top health-care managed states, Blue Cross and Blue Shield announced that it would not sell individual insurance policies next year due to concerns over cost. Skyrocketing health-care costs will affect the affordability of private insurance and the existence of public health-care programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, and subsidized insurance sold under the Exchanges.
Health Reform and the “Vulnerables”
In the health insurance industry, young adults are known as the “invincibles.” Like the superheroes that inhabit movies and TV now, these young men and women believe they are impervious to illness, disease, and injury. Therefore, they do not acquire health-care coverage, believing they are invincible. It is human nature to create groupings of individuals and name that grouping. We commonly talk about “baby boomers” and “millennials.” Tennessee Williams said that he wrote about the “incomplete.” Studs Terkel, in his book, Working, said he interviewed and wrote about the “uncelebrated.” Today for this blog, I create my own grouping. Here’s why.
Health Reform and Oversight, Ombudsmen, and Obfuscation
“Iowa has two ombudsmen to investigate and advocate for the 560,000 poor or disabled recipients on the (Medicaid) program.”
— The Des Moines Register, February 28, 2016
I salute Jason Clayworth, the reporter who wrote the Des Moines Register article from which the above quote is taken, as well as Tony Leys, another Register reporter, and the Des Moines Register editorial staff. Their tireless efforts to investigate and comment on the upcoming transformation of the Iowa Medicaid program to a for-profit managed-care model has brought some clarity to the issue, as well as exposed some potential flaws. Iowa is only the fourth state in the country to completely adopt this new model across its various Medicaid programs.